VisaGenie · AI visa assistant · 2025

Empowering transparent visa journeys

An AI chatbot that gives free, professional-quality visa guidance, flags illegal employer charges, and explains why an application was rejected.

Lead UX Researcher & Designer

Research, personas, prioritization, IA, UI and testing · 12 weeks

Meet the genie
visagenie.appGuest mode
Hi, I'm VisaGenie. Which country are you applying to?
The US — an F-1 student visa.
Three steps first: pay the SEVIS fee, book your visa interview, then gather your financial documents.travel.state.govSEVP FAQ

Heads up: employers can't legally charge most visa fees. If yours is asking for money upfront, open the fraud guide.

Ask about your visa…

ROLE

Lead UX Researcher & Designer

RESEARCH

47 interviews · 312 surveys · 9 experts

STACK

GPT-4 · LangChain · Pinecone · Flask

DURATION

12 weeks, discovery to validated prototype

95%

conversion to first message, up from 20% with onboarding

2 min

average time from landing to answer

92%

task success: users got what they needed

3.2

questions per session

Measured in flow testing of the validated prototype.

The problem

Visa applications aren’t just confusing. They’re systematically exploitative.

From 47 interviews and 312 survey responses: a $2.3B problem hiding in plain sight.

Financial exploitation

67%

of sponsored employees illegally charged by employers

$2.3B

wasted annually on unnecessary fees

84%

don’t know sponsors’ legal responsibilities

Information crisis

89%

can’t find clear, accurate information

12+ hrs

researching across 8+ sources

$500–5k

paid to agents for basic guidance

Systemic opacity

89%

of rejected applicants never learn why

34%

reapply without improvements and fail again

3–6 mo

of processing with zero visibility

“My employer demanded $2,800 upfront for my visa sponsorship. I didn’t know this was illegal until I’d already paid.”

Chris, research participant

Research methodology

Mixed methods across five countries

Four weeks of discovery across the US, Canada, UK, Australia and Germany, with consent protocols and secure data storage.

47

User interviews

45–60 minutes each, with current applicants and recent completers: pain points, costs, employer experiences.

312+

Survey responses

Quantitative validation of interview findings, plus cost analysis and rejection-rate data.

9

Stakeholder interviews

3 immigration lawyers, 2 former visa agents and 4 HR professionals who handle sponsorship.

vg-03-research-insights.png

Personas

Three people, 89% of the pain points

vg-04-persona-sarah.png

Struggling Student Sarah

23 · F-1 student visa · $500 budget

“I just need someone to tell me exactly what to do, step by step, without trying to sell me something.”

PRIMARY PAIN

Can’t afford $1,500–3,000 agents but needs professional-quality guidance.

vg-05-persona-marcus.png

Corporate Relocator Marcus

34 · H-1B work visa

“HR says this is ‘standard practice’ but something feels wrong. I can’t lose this promotion by pushing back.”

PRIMARY PAIN

Employer illegally demanding $2,800 in visa fees, unaware it’s illegal.

vg-06-persona-rita.png

Family Reunification Rita

45 · IR-5 family visa

“After $3,200 and 14 months, I got a rejection saying ‘insufficient evidence.’ Evidence of what?!”

PRIMARY PAIN

Rejected with a one-paragraph explanation and no idea what went wrong.

How might we

12 design challenges from 359 data points

Each theme became HMW statements before any feature was chosen. Six of the twelve:

FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION

How might we protect users from illegal employer practices without requiring legal expertise?

FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION

How might we eliminate the need for expensive agents for basic applications?

INFORMATION CRISIS

How might we centralize fragmented visa information without overwhelming users?

INFORMATION CRISIS

How might we ensure users trust the information they receive?

SYSTEMIC OPACITY

How might we help rejected applicants understand what went wrong?

SYSTEMIC OPACITY

How might we improve reapplication success after rejection?

Feature prioritization

Impact vs effort, then a decision matrix

An impact/effort matrix chose what to build first; six solution types were scored against five criteria.

Impact vs effort: quick wins, big bets, fill-ins and time sinks
Impact vs effort: quick wins, big bets, fill-ins and time sinks

SOLUTION SCORES · OUT OF 50

AI chatbot

44

Traditional website

40

Community forum

35

Native mobile app

34

Email / form service

32

Human expert chat

23

Why the AI chatbot won

It combines instant access, personalized guidance, infinite scale and free use, the exact failures of existing options.

RAG over verified immigration data, with source citations on every answer, keeps GPT-4 grounded and limits hallucination.

PHASE 1 · MVP, 12 WEEKS

AI chatbot, document checklist, multi-country support, LLM knowledge base

PHASE 2

Fraud detection, rejection analyzer, cost calculator

PHASE 3

Multi-language, community features, application tracking

Competitive landscape

The gap: expert guidance, free and always on

Lawyers are reliable but costly; forums and general AI are free but unreliable. VisaGenie aims for both.

Reliability vs accessibility
Reliability vs accessibility
Feature comparison: lawyers, LegalZoom, forums, general AI
Feature comparison: lawyers, LegalZoom, forums, general AI

Information architecture & user flow

Get to value fast, whoever you are

Three decisions balanced speed, flexibility and guidance.

DECISION 01 · SPEED

Guest-first access

Skip onboarding and start chatting with just a country selection. 95% of users choose guest mode.

DECISION 02 · FLEXIBILITY

Three entry paths

Guest, user login and admin login all converge on the same high-value chatbot.

DECISION 03 · GUIDANCE

Context-aware routing

Mention employer fees and a fraud alert appears; mention a rejection and the analyzer is offered.

Complete user flow
Complete user flow
Information architecture: navigation, core content, contextual features
Information architecture: navigation, core content, contextual features
Three scenarios: Sarah’s F-1 checklist, Marcus’s fraud alert, Rita’s rejection analysis
Three scenarios: Sarah’s F-1 checklist, Marcus’s fraud alert, Rita’s rejection analysis

High-fidelity UI

One chat, three journeys

30+ screens across web, tablet and mobile, with the fraud alert and rejection analyzer surfacing in context.

High-fidelity prototypes
High-fidelity prototypes
Chatbot UI with guided questions
Chatbot UI with guided questions
Fraud alert, rejection analyzer, chat history
Fraud alert, rejection analyzer, chat history
Landing, login and guest entry
Landing, login and guest entry
Welcome and country selection
Welcome and country selection

Brand & visual design

Trust with a touch of magic

Calm blues build trust; lavender and green add warmth and signal actions and status.

Deep Slate Blue

#2A4D69

Soft Sky Blue

#5DADE2

Muted Lavender

#8572A3

Pastel Green

#A9DFBF

Dark Charcoal

#333333

Cool Light Gray

#D5DBDB

Off-White

#FDFDFD

Pure Black

#000000

Logo: travel, trust and a hint of magic
Logo: travel, trust and a hint of magic
App icon on mobile and in the tablet app
App icon on mobile and in the tablet app
Poppins, in four weights
Poppins, in four weights
Iconly Sharp and Bulk icons
Iconly Sharp and Bulk icons

Flow testing

Removing onboarding took conversion from 20% to 95%

KEY INSIGHT

The single biggest improvement came from removing the multi-step onboarding (name, email, country, visa type). Instant guest access with just a country selection lifted conversion from 20% to 95%.

EDGE CASES DESIGNED

AI can’t answer: official links and a lawyer referral

Unsupported country: friendly message and email signup

High traffic: wait estimate, then cached FAQ answers

Returning users: skip country selection, restore context

BUILT WITH

GPT-4LangChainPineconePythonFlaskReactJavaScriptHTML/CSSFigma

Research figures come from my own interviews and surveys. The $2.3B figure is my research estimate. This page shows my role as lead UX researcher and designer.

MORE PROJECTS

All work